AnnBibNeiswender

Main source- [|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism]- This source gave me all of my information on Nazism. It was useful to me because of  my limited knowledge of Nazism besides what went on in WWII. Because my wiki is about why Nazism is so effective knowing about Nazism would be quite helpful. The bias in this would depend on who was the main composer of this wiki. Lets say a stong opposer Nazideology wrote this article to turn everyone against Nazism and only provide information that makes Nazism sound like the worst thing ever, although it is a very bad thing, it is not helpful to only get biased information when looking for reasons why it was so accepted in Germany. On the other hand, lets say an avid participator in neo-nazi activities wrote it, they would only give good information about it but none of the bad parts and that too would be useless. The Nazism wiki itself has many different sources. After some searching through the sources page I found that the main source was encyclopedia Brittanica. I would say this is a trustworthy somewhat neutral source because they are a company that tries to provide the best information for people so they will continue to buy their product. It talks all about Nazism, how it was founded, where it was found, and what its main purpose was. The scope of the writing really contains itself to Germany and Austria so not much can be learned from that wiki about where Nazism spread. [] -I used this source to help learn more about the origins of the Aryan race bias. I had thought it was propoganda from Hitler's party but apparently it came from Friedrich Nietzsche, which I was not aware of before. The bias in this source would be similar to what i listed above, and in turn have the same effects on my research.